Sarah Smith should be Payroll Manager of the Year 2008 because she has taken on a great deal of responsibility in a short space of time and all the initiatives she has worked on or led at Medium Manufacturing have had a real impact, both on the business bottom line and on employee satisfaction with payroll. During 2007, payroll accuracy reached 99.8%, which is a good improvement from the days of outsourcing where accuracy had dropped to 88.6%.
In the last year there have been two big projects which Sarah has led that highlight why she should win the award. The first relates to our expenses programme and the second to the salary sacrifice scheme (see above for details).
Expenses results:
The system has been in place for six months now and in 86% of cases the SLA is being met. Where it is not being met this is generally due to incorrect data or lack of receipts. No expense payment has taken longer than 12 days since the new system was introduced.
Sarah was the driver behind the new expenses procedure and has already been recognised internally for her work, having receiving an award in our quarterly awards programme.
Salary sacrifice results:
A calculation tool developed by Sarah and her team played a big part in increasing take-up. At every presentation the team did they showed how the tool could be used and helped people understand the results. The tool, which demonstrated the tax and NICs advantages for employees of utilising salary sacrifice to receive, for example, childcare vouchers, was also available on the internet. Take-up increased to 40% this year – the sort of increase the senior managers were looking for.
Payroll rating:
Medium Manufacturing carries out employee satisfaction surveys every year. The survey gather views on the various departments which service our employees, such as HR, finance, IT and payroll, and employee opinions on line managers etc.
The payroll department is providing a very good service according to 95% of respondents and 90% said problems were dealt with professionally and as quickly as possible. This compares well with HR’s ratings of 70% and 65% respectively.
The most regular comments were about the work done by Sarah and her team to promote the salary sacrifice scheme, with even some of those employees who have not taken part saying that the payroll team had given them the information to make a conscious decision rather than not taking part because they didn’t understand.
Sarah herself received a very good rating from her team, who all identified her as a manager who pitches in and listens to her employees, but who takes responsibility and makes the big decisions.
Bringing payroll in-house:
While the Finance Director was reasonably happy with the service provided by the bureau he felt that bringing the service in-house would allow the company to provide a better and more immediate service for its employees.
Since taking over the payroll in 2003 his hopes have been realised, as Sarah and her team (recruited after she completed her training), working with the HR team, have amongst other things ensured that the overall accuracy rates have steadily improved.
|